Resection In Elderly Patients Research Articles

Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Aggressive Multimodal Management of Elderly Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NAT followed by surgical resection in patients with PDAC aged ≥75 years. Whether administration of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgical resection in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is safe and effective is unknown. The present study is a three-part comparison of older (≥ 75 years) versus younger (< 75 years) patients in different settings throughout the continuum of PDAC care. The first analysis was a comparison of older versus younger consecutive patients with non-metastatic PDAC who were initiated on FOLFIRINOX. The second was a comparison of older vs. younger patients who underwent NAT followed by surgical resection, and the third and final analysis was a comparison of older patients who underwent either NAT followed by surgical resection vs. upfront surgical resection. Postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and time to recurrence (TTR), were compared. Propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders. In the first analysis, a lower proportion of older patients (n=40) were able to complete the intended neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (8) cycles compared to younger patients (n=214) (65.0% vs. 81.4%, P=0.021). However, older patients were just as likely to undergo surgical exploration as younger patients (77.5% vs 78.5%, P=0.89) as well as surgical resection (57.5% vs 55.6%, P=0.70). In the second analysis, PSM was conducted to compare older (n=54) vs. younger patients (n=54) who underwent NAT followed by surgical resection. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the matched groups. While there was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between older and younger patients (median OS: 16.43 months vs. 30.83 months, P=0.002), importantly, there was no significant difference in time to recurrence (TTR, median: 7.65 months vs. 11.83 months, P=0.215). In the third analysis, older patients who underwent NAT followed by surgical resection (n=48) were compared with similar older patients who underwent upfront surgical resection (n=48). After PSM, there was a significant difference in OS (median OS: 15.78 months vs. 11.51 months, P=0.037) as well as TTR (median TTR: 8.81 months vs. 7.10 months, P=0.046) representing an association with improved outcomes that favored the neoadjuvant approach among older patients alone. This comprehensive three-part study showed that administration of NAT followed by surgical resection appears to be safe and effective among patients ≥ 75 years of age. An aggressive approach should be offered to older adults undergoing multimodal treatment of PDAC.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting pulmonary complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in elderly patients with lung cancer.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly increase the morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with lung cancer. Considering the adverse effects of PPCs, we aimed to derive and validate a nomogram to predict pulmonary complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in elderly patients with lung cancer and to assist surgeons in optimizing patient-centered treatment plans. The study enrolled 854 eligible elderly patients with lung cancer who underwent sub-lobectomy or lobectomy. A clinical prediction model for the probability of PPCs was developed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Furthermore, data from one center were used to derive the model, and data from another were used for external validation. The model's discriminatory capability, predictive accuracy, and clinical usefulness were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, respectively. Among the eligible elderly patients with lung cancer, 214 (25.06%) developed pulmonary complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, surgical procedure, operative time, forced expiratory volume in one second, and the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung were independent predictors of PPCs and were included in the final model. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the training and validation sets were 0.844 and 0.796, respectively. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the generalizability of the predictive model, with an average AUC value of 0.839. The calibration curve showed good consistency between the observed and predicted probabilities. The proposed nomogram showed good net benefit with a relatively wide range of threshold probabilities. A nomogram for elderly patients with lung cancer can be derived using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Our model can also be accessed using the online web server https://pulmonary-disease-predictor.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/. Combining both may help surgeons as a clinically easy-to-use tool for minimizing the prevalence of pulmonary complications after lung resection in elderly patients.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resection: Is it beneficial for survival in elderly patients?

IntroductionAs the population ages, surgeons are growing frequently faced with hard choices among a vast array of treatment options for the elderly. This study was to investigate safety and efficacy of resection in elderly patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Patients and methodsLiterature reading and meta-analysis unveiled that elderly PHCC patients held a higher risk of death within 90 days after hepatectomy relative to younger patients, but their 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable. Among PHCC patients who underwent hepatectomy, the proportion of elderly patients with tumor classification Bismuth I–II and tumor stage pStage 1–3 was significantly higher than that of younger patients. ResultsCurative resection R0 was more common in elderly patients than younger patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. Because of more comorbidities and less physiological reserve of elderly patients, they seemed to suffer more postoperative complications. ConclusionConsidering improved life expectancy, it is crucial to treat elderly PHCC patients appropriately and attempts should be made to radical surgery based on comorbidities and functional status.

Risk stratification of postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing lung cancer resection: a propensity score-matched study.

In China, lung cancer mainly affects the elderly population. Surgery remains the standard treatment for lung cancer in elderly patients, however, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are major contributors to morbidity and mortality following lung resection. This study aimed to identify perioperative predictors of PPCs among elderly patients undergoing pulmonary resection for lung cancer to provide evidence for better prevention and intervention for PPCs. A retrospective study was conducted with 456 patients (age >65 years) undergoing pulmonary resection for lung cancer in Yunnan, China from January 2016 to March 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare preoperative data and clinical characteristics between the PPC and non-PPC groups, followed by binary logistic regression to evaluate predictors of PPCs. Pulmonary complications occurred in 142/456 (31.1%) patients age >65 years, with pneumonia being the most common event (21.7%). Both PSM and binary logistic regression analysis identified American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class <II [odds ratio (OR): 0.177, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.037-0.854] and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) (OR: 0.576, 95% CI: 0.334-0.992) as protective factors for PPCs. PPCs following lung cancer resection in elderly patients were associated with a higher ASA classification and open thoracotomy. An adequate and comprehensive evaluation of the operative strategies and enhanced recovery methods should be implemented among elderly patients undergoing lung resection with an ASA class > II or those undergoing an open thoracotomy to help prevent the occurrence of PPCs.

Impact of frailty on long-term outcomes after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: A prospective study

BackgroundsFrailty affects short-term outcomes after liver resection in elderly patients. However, frailty's effects on long-term outcomes after liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are unknown. MethodsThis prospective, single-center study included 81 independently living patients aged ≥65 years scheduled to undergo liver resection for initial HCC. Frailty was evaluated according to the Kihon Checklist, a phenotypic frailty index.” We investigated and compared postoperative long-term outcomes after liver resection between patients with and without frailty. ResultsOf the 81 patients, 25 (30.9%) were frail. The proportion of patients with cirrhosis, high serum alpha-fetoprotein level (≥200 ng/mL), and poorly differentiated HCC was higher in the frail group than in the nonfrail group (n = 56). Among the patients with postoperative recurrence, the incidence of extrahepatic recurrence was higher in the frail group than in the nonfrail group (30.8% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.028). Moreover, the proportion of patients who underwent repeat liver resection and ablation for recurrence who met the Milan criteria tended to be lower in the frail group than in the nonfrail group. Although there was no difference in disease-free survival between the two groups, the overall survival rate in the frail group was significantly worse than that in the nonfrail group (5-year overall survival: 42.7% vs. 77.2%, P = 0.005). Results of the multivariate analysis indicated that frailty and blood loss were independent prognostic factors for postoperative survival. ConclusionFrailty is associated with unfavorable long-term outcomes after liver resection in elderly patients with HCC.

Pulmonary function protection by single-port thoracoscopic segmental lung resection in elderly patients with IA non-small cell lung cancer: A differential matched analysis.

In patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) anatomical segmentectomy removes the lung tumor while preserving lung function as much as possible, and it is therefore an alternative to lobectomy. Patients with stage IA NSCLC receiving U-VATS segmental resection at our institution from September 2017 to June 2019 were compared with patients receiving U-VATS lobectomy. A total of 47 patients received segmentectomy and 209 patients received U-VATS lobectomy in the same period. Propensity score matching was conducted to diminish bias. The final study cohort included 42 patients who received segmentectomy and 42 propensity score matching-matched patients who received lobectomy. Perioperative parameters and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) were compared between the 2 groups. Surgery was successfully completed in all patients. The mean follow-up was for 8.2 months. The postoperative complication rate was comparable between the 2 groups: 31.0% in segmentectomy patients versus 35.7% in lobectomy patients (P = .643). At 1 month after surgery, FEV1% and FVC% were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > .05). At 3 months after surgery, FEV1 and FVC were higher in segmentectomy patients than in lobectomy patients (FEV1, 82.79% ± 6.36% vs 78.55% ± 5.42%; FVC, 81.66% ± 6.09% vs 78.90% ± 5.58%, P < .05). Patients receiving segmentectomy suffer less pain and have better postoperative lung function and higher quality of life.

Benefits of laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients.

The indications of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have expanded to high-risk patients, such as elderly people. However, to date, little evidence has been established of the safety and feasibility of LLR in elderly patients. The short-term outcomes of LLR in elderly patients as compared to non-elderly patients were investigated. Data of a total of 297 patients who underwent LLR were reviewed. Among these 297 patients, 181 patients were < 75years age (non-elderly) and 116 patients were ≥ 75years age (elderly), and the surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. In addition, we evaluated the risk factors for postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) utilizing the preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables RESULTS: The preoperative liver/renal function, frequency of anti-thrombotic drug use, number of comorbidities, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status classification were more unfavorable in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients. No significant inter-group differences were observed in the operation time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, or 30-day mortality. The 3-year overall survival rate was comparable between the two groups. Multivariate analysis identified anti-thrombotic drug use, operation time > 7h, and peak serum total bilirubin > 2mg/dl within postoperative day 3 as independent risk factors for Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa postoperative morbidity (P = 0.016, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). LLR in elderly patients may provide comparable short-term outcomes to those in non-elderly patients.

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for early gastric cancer that is not indicated for endoscopic resection in elderly patients.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is sometimes performed for early gastric cancer (EGC) which is not indicated for endoscopic resection (ER) in elderly patients considering old age and comorbidities. We aimed to compare outcomes between ESD and surgery in elderly patients with EGC that is not indicated for ER. Elderly patients aged ≥ 75years who underwent either ESD or surgery for EGC which was not indicated for ER between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively investigated. Among a total of 294 patients, 59 (20.1%) and 235 (79.9%) patients underwent ESD and surgery as the initial treatment, respectively. The ESD group had smaller size of tumors (25 vs. 30mm, p = .001) and higher rate of differentiated-type cancer than the surgery group had (88.1% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.001). With a median observation period of 91.8months (range 11.6-198.1months), 141 (48.0%) patients died: 25 (42.4%) and 116 (49.4%) patients in the ESD group and the surgery group, respectively. Overall survival and disease-free survival between the two groups had no significant differences (p = 0.982. p = 0.155, respectively). ESD may be an alternative option for EGC which is not indicated for ER in elderly patients aged ≥ 75years, considering old age and comorbidity.

Clinical and survival outcomes of colectomy for transverse colon cancer in elderly patients.

It remains controversial whether elderly patients with transverse colon cancer present worse prognoses. Our study utilized evidence from multi-center databases to evaluate the perioperative and oncology outcomes of radical resection of colon cancer in elderly and nonelderly patients. In this study, we analyzed 416 patients with transverse colon cancer who underwent radical surgery from January 2004 to May 2017, including 151 elderly (aged ≥ 65 years) and 265 nonelderly (aged < 65 years) patients. We retrospectively compared the perioperative and oncological outcomes between these 2 groups. The median follow-up in the elderly and nonelderly groups was 52 and 64 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) (P = .300) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .380) between the elderly and nonelderly groups. However, the elderly group had longer hospital stays (P < .001), a higher complication rate (P = .027), and fewer lymph nodes harvested (P = .002). The N classification and differentiation were significantly associated with OS based on univariate analysis, and the N classification was an independent prognostic factor for OS based on multivariate analysis (P < .05). Similarly, the N classification and differentiation were significantly correlated with the DFS based on univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis indicated that the N classification was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (P < .05). In conclusion, the survival and surgical outcomes in elderly patients were similar to nonelderly patients. The N classification was an independent factor for OS and DFS. Even though elderly patients with transverse colon cancer present a higher surgical risk than nonelderly patients, performing radical resection in elderly patients can be an appropriate choice for treatment.

Oncologic Liver Resections in a Geriatric Population: Peri-operative,Long-Term and Quality-of-Life Outcomes-Experience from a High-Volume Centre in India.

Elderly patients can often be overlooked as candidates for a major hepatic resection, by virtue of their age. To enable better patient selection for hepatic resections in this age group, we analysed the outcomes of liver resections in elderly patients to identify any potential prognostic factors. We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of hepatic resections from 1 January 2010 to 31 October 2021 and analysed the post-operative outcomes in patients aged 65years or older. Short-term outcomes were analysed in terms of length of hospital stay, 90-day major morbidity, and 90-day mortality. Long-term outcome was defined by the disease-free survival, overall survival and quality of life. Over a period of 11years, 170 elderly patients underwent oncologic liver resections, of which 68 (40%) underwent a major hepatectomy. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 32.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Extent of hepatic resection, increasing age, concomitant resection of other organs and a biliary-enteric anastomosis were independent predictors for poor immediate post-operative outcomes. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 30months and 78months, respectively. The global health status was excellent in majority of patients with a mean score of 88.62. Major oncologic liver resections can be performed in well-selected geriatric population with acceptable peri-operative, long-term and quality-of-life outcomes.

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection is safe and effective in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocacinoma: A propensity score-matching analysis

Background: Whether administration of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgical resection in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is safe and effective is unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NAT in patients with PDAC aged ≥75 years.

Possibility of ultrathin endoscopy in radial incision and cutting for esophageal strictures.

Video 1The radial incision and cutting procedure using ultrathin endoscopy.

Evaluating the Impact of Preoperative Geriatric-Specific Variables and Modified Frailty Index on Postoperative Outcomes After Elective Pancreatic Surgery.

Pursuing pancreatic resection in elderly patients is often complex and limited by concern for functional status and postoperative risk. This study examines the associations between two different preoperative functional status metrics with postoperative outcomes in the geriatric population. Patients who participated in the ACS NSQIP Geriatric Surgery Research File pilot program (2014-2018) undergoing elective pancreatic operations were included. Two clinically meaningful functional status scores were calculated: the presence of one or more geriatric-specific variable (GSV) and a 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5). Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for ACS NSQIP-estimated risk was performed to evaluate associations between preoperative GSV, mFI-5 and 30-day outcome measures. A total of 1266 patients were included: 808 (64%) age 65-74, 302 (24%) age 75-80, and 156 (12%) age ≥ 81; 843 (67%) patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Operations were performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 712 (56%) patients. Older patients had greater likelihood of postoperative morbidity (35% vs 31% vs 47%, by age group, p = 0.004) and discharge to a facility (12% vs 23% vs 48%, by age group, p &lt; 0.001). Adjusting for ACS NSQIP predicted risk, patients with a preoperative GSV were more likely to require reoperation and discharge to a facility (OR 1.81 [95% CI 1.03-3.16] and 3.95 [95% CI 2.91-5.38], respectively). The mFI-5 was not associated with postoperative outcomes (all p ≥ 0.18). The presence of a preoperative GSV is associated with reoperation and discharge to a skilled facility following elective pancreatic resection. Geriatric-specific variables should be considered in joint preoperative decision making to optimize care.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients: A Nationwide Analysis

BackgroundThe number of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer is growing, however clinical data on the short-term outcomes, rate of adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival in these patients are limited and we therefore performed a nationwide analysis.MethodsData from the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit were analyzed, including all patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection between January 2014 and December 2016. Patients were classified into two age groups: <75 and ≥75 years. Major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade 3 or higher), 90-day mortality, rates of adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival were compared between age groups. Factors associated with start of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival were evaluated with logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression analysis.ResultsOf 836 patients, 198 were aged ≥75 years (24%) and 638 were aged <75 years (76%). Median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range [IQR] 31–47). Major complications (31% vs. 28%; p = 0.43) and 90-day mortality (8% vs. 5%; p = 0.18) did not differ. Adjuvant chemotherapy was started in 37% of patients aged ≥75 years versus 69% of patients aged <75 years (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14–18) versus 21 months (95% CI 19–24; p < 0.001). Age ≥75 years was not independently associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.79–1.17; p = 0.71), but was associated with a lower rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.40; p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe rate of major complications and 90-day mortality after pancreatic resection did not differ between elderly and younger patients; however, elderly patients were less often treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and their OS was shorter.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis

Surgical resection is a first-line curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma, but its role is still unclear in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.The study included 665 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma liver resection cases in patients with ≥70 years of age treated in eight European hospital centres. Patients were divided into laparoscopic and open liver resection groups. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups.After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 219 patients were included in each group. Clavien-Dindo grades III/IV (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.04) were lower in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group. Hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group (5 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between laparoscopic and open groups regarding overall survival and disease-free survival at 1-, 3- and 5- year periods.Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with good short-term outcomes in patients with ≥70 years of age compared to open liver resection. Laparoscopic liver resection is safe and feasible in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

A scoring system to predict the risk of major complications after laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The safety of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in elderly patients is a matter of concern because the reduced physiologic reserve increases the risk of postoperative complications. However, there are few score systems for predicting complications after LLR in elderly patients. The aim of this study is to propose a new simplified scoring system based on the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) to predict major complications after LLR in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively reviewed 257 consecutive patients aged ≥ 65years who underwent LLR for HCC between 2004 and 2019. The GNRI formula was 1.489 × serum albumin (g/L) + 41.7 × present weight/ideal weight (kg). A scoring system to predict the risk of major complications was developed by assigning points to each risk factor equal to its regression coefficient determined in the multivariable analysis. Major complications were defined as complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher. Of the 257 patients, 219 patients were finally included in this study. Major complications occurred after LLR in 24 patients (10.9%). Multivariable analysis showed that the GNRI (hazard ratio [HR] 3.396, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.242-9.288, P = 0.017), Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (HR 2.191, 95% CI 1.400-8.999, P = 0.036), major liver resection (HR 2.683, 95% CI 1.082-7.328, P = 0.050), and intraoperative transfusion (HR 1.802, 95% CI 1.428-7.591, P = 0.022) were independent predictors of major postoperative complications. These variables were assigned points based on their HRs, and the resulting 10-point model showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.756, 95% CI 0.649-0.836, P = 0.001). The scoring system outperformed the GNRI for predicting major complications after LLR in elderly patients with HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Elderly Patients.

Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are prevalent in elderly patients. Endoscopic resection has become popular for treating small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs. However, little is known about the outcomes of endoscopic resection in elderly patients. Aim To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs in elderly patients (≥65 years old). Methods A total of 260 patients (265 lesions) with gastric GISTs treated via endoscopic resection from January 2011 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 65 patients were ≥65 years old (elderly group), and 195 patients were <65 years old (nonelderly group). Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, and tumor recurrence rates between the two age groups were compared. Results A total of 260 patients with primary small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs were treated with endoscopic resection. The median ages of the elderly and nonelderly groups were 68 (range 65-83) years and 55 (range 32-64) years, respectively. Elderly patients showed a higher incidence of comorbidities compared with nonelderly patients (61.5% versus 32.3%s, respectively; p < 0.001). All elderly patients and 99.0% of nonelderly patients underwent en bloc resection; only two nonelderly patients received piecemeal resection. No significant differences were found regarding postoperative complications or tumor recurrence rates between the two groups. Conclusions Although elderly patients had more comorbidities than nonelderly patients, both groups had similar postoperative complications and recurrence rates. We suggest that endoscopic resection performed by experienced endoscopists is safe and effective for treating small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs in elderly patients.

Surgical treatment of liver hydatid cyst in elderly patients: A propensity score-matching retrospective cohort study

BackgroundCystic echinococcosis is a clinically complex chronic parasitic disease and a major socioeconomic problem in endemic areas. The safety of liver resection in elderly patients is often debated among medical professionals. We analyzed the postoperative morbidity and mortality rates of elderly patients who underwent surgery at our unit. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with liver hydatid cysts which were surgically removed at our unit. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (patients < 70 years), and Group 2 (patients ≥ 70 years). Propensity score matching (PSM) and comparative analyses between groups were performed. ResultsThe unmatched cohort consisted of 279 patients (Group 1: 244; Group 2: 35). After PSM, we compared the outcomes for 56 patients from Group 1 to 31 patients from Group 2. A higher rate of severe complications was observed in Group 2 (25.8% vs 5.36%, p = 0.014). No difference was found in the rates of infectious, cardiorespiratory, or hemorrhagic complications between both groups, and in the mortality rate either (0.00% vs 6.45%, p = 0.124). ConclusionsLiver surgery in selected elderly patients is safe and practicable. The low postoperative morbidity rate in these patients is acceptable, albeit higher, due to their comorbidities.

Management of elderly patients with early gastric cancer in Japan.

Management of elderly patients with early gastric cancer is an important issue in an aging society such as Japan. While endoscopic resection is recommended as the standard treatment for early gastric cancers with extremely low risk of lymph node metastasis (<1%), gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is recommended for the other early gastric cancers as the standard treatment even in elderly patients. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the most recommended endoscopic resection procedure because of its high ability for 'en bloc' resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection can reportedly provide favorable short-term outcomes in elderly patients. In terms of patient prognosis, the importance of considering patients' physical and nutritional conditions before endoscopic submucosal dissection has recently attracted attention. With respect to gastrectomy, the nationwide data in Japan have demonstrated relatively low 5-year overall survival and non-negligible post-operative 90-day mortality in men aged ≥75years and women aged ≥80years compared with those in younger patients. Among these elderly patients, 20% or more reportedly died within 5years after gastrectomy mostly due to other diseases. These facts suggested the necessity of a less invasive management option for the elderly patients. Efforts are being made to provide a non-invasive follow-up option without gastrectomy following endoscopic resection in elderly patients. To avoid the increase in gastric cancer-related deaths, the selection of patients with relatively low lymph node metastasis risk is essential, and several tools to estimate the lymph node metastasis risk from early gastric cancers have been developed. To avoid overtreatment with gastrectomy in more elderly early gastric cancer patients, new endoscopic submucosal dissection indications for them are also warranted.

Liver resection in elderly patients with extensive CRLM: Are we offering an adequate treatment? A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundData on the management of elderly patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are scarce and conflicting. This study assesses differences in management and long-term oncological outcomes between older and younger patients with CRLM and a high Tumour Burden Score (TBS). MethodsInternational multicentre retrospective study on patients with CRLM and a category 3 TBS, submitted to liver resection. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age (younger and older than 75) and were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and multivariable regression models. Differences in management and oncological outcomes including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. ResultsThe study included 386 patients, median follow-up was 48 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a higher ASA score (p = 0.035), less synchronous CRLM (47% vs 68%, p = 0.003), a lower median number of lesions (1 vs 3, p = 0.004) and less perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) (66% vs 88%, p < 0.001) in the elderly group.Despite the absence of CTx being an independent predictor of decreased RFS and OS (HR 0.760, p = 0.044 and HR 0.719, p = 0.049, respectively), the elderly group still received less CTx (OR 0.317, p = 0.001) than the younger group.After PSM (n = 100 patients), the two groups were comparable, however, CTx administration was still significantly lower in the elderly group. ConclusionLiver resection should be considered in patients aged 75 and older, even if they present with extensive liver disease. Despite CTx being associated with improved oncological outcomes, a large percentage of elderly patients with CRLM are undertreated.